weiright.blogg.se - Olympus viewer 3 copy raw settings to other images

Olympus viewer 3 copy raw settings to other images archive#
Olympus viewer 3 copy raw settings to other images skin#
Olympus viewer 3 copy raw settings to other images free#

PhotoNinja for the sharpest, snappier raw rendering on the market, as complement. Olympus Viewer, Capture One for Oly colors. A good different vision than Olympus Viewer or Capture One Olympus colors rendering. Period.You can make a 200 bucks lens looks sharp like a 2000 bucks one 😉 Don’t provide Olympus colors, BUT can really enhance an ORF (and more, like Fuji Trans X). PhotoNinja : best demosaicing on the market. It doesn’t work for me, even less than LR5. A good alternative to Olympus Viewer for faster work. A little less effective than PhotoNinja for demosaicing. I put the same ORF side by side : impossible to know witch one is. Select the equivalent profile and you get the same result than Olympus Viewer. Capture One : perfect (and i said perfect) Olympus colors. I hate to loose time correcting something witch was perfect BEFORE LR mess. Not good at all without “tweaked to death” profiles. And when messed, it is almost impossible to correct.

Because stock, LR mess the color balance. Lightroom (4 and 5) : very nice…only when i used a tweaked VSCO film profile. I tested almost all Raw rendering on E-PL5, XZ-2 and E-M10 :

Olympus viewer 3 copy raw settings to other images skin#

I NEVER seen any other camera doing that, apart may be Nikon (the famous “Nikon skin tones”). My Olympus (XZ-2, E-PL5, E-M10 😉 ) cams can be shot in Vivid setting, even for Caucasian skin portraits.

The node of “Olympus colors” is they can be saturated to extreme, they keep a centered balance.

Olympus viewer 3 copy raw settings to other images free#

What are your experiences in comparing RAW conversion? Feel free to leave a comment. I still use Lightroom extensively for Post Processing and have absolutely no complaints with the editing capabilities.Īs for the photo of the leader, here is the final photo after Lightroom editing of the TIFF produced by Olympus Viewer 3. For now, I have incorporated Camera Viewer 3 into my workflow and will continue using that till something better comes along. My end result? From now on, I no longer use Adobe products to convert my Olympus RAW files.

Olympus viewer 3 copy raw settings to other images archive#

Perhaps most importantly, archive all your original RAW files in case better RAW processors come available, or you simply find a superior solution to what you are currently using.

It is well worth the exercise to try different RAW converters for your particular camera and to choose the best solution.

Of course, for other camera types, it is quite possible it does a fantastic job. My experience suggests Adobe’s RAW conversion of Olympus files is not nearly as good as Olympus’ solution.

RAW converters very much produce different results.

What can we learn from this? I think it boils down to a few things: Unfortunately, for many files I erased the original RAW files, thinking the DNGs were just as good! I spent about a year using DNG Converter before I realized all RAW converters are not created equally. This is not to say Adobe’s converter produces inferior results from all camera makes and models, but I can certainly tell you I no longer use it to convert my RAW files.

Sharpness: You cannot see it here, but results from Camera Viewer 3 are notably sharper.įor my Olympus RAW files, I found the results from Adobe’s DNG Converter to be completely inferior to the TIFFs produced by Olympus Viewer 3.

In general, I find Adobe’s converter produces skin tones that are too red and rather difficult to ‘neutralize’.

Colours: Personally, I prefer the Olympus renderings particularly for skin tones and greens.

Even at ISO200 and especially with ISO’s in the thousands.

Noise: Viewer 3 noise appears much lower than that of Adobe’s DNG Converter.

The TIFF from Olympus Viewer 3 looks much more natural and appealing. Detail and saturation of “intense” colours – The Adobe product rendered pinks and reds of with excessive saturation coupled with significant loss of detail.Other than a bit of sharpening, there were no further manipulations.Ĭlearly, both RAW converters produced different results. Comparing results of RAW converters on Olympus RAW files